Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand

October 31, 2010 at 19:01 (Book Reviews, Fiction, Philosophy, Politics) (, , , , )


It is startling and discomfiting when one reads a supposed classic only to find it devoid of any redeeming features whatsoever. All the way through, the thought replays itself; “Somebody must like this book…” Ayn Rand’s characters have been excused their lifelessness and two dimensionality by the nature of their parable. How better to paint a grim and frightening picture than with dreadful and wearisome implements?

Her murky and aggressive philiosophy has been defended as a reaction against the pallid socialisms or dreadful communisms of her day, though a clearer case of cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face, might never be found. She takes the frigid, souless and utterly unfair ideas of equality-at-all-costs, shirking and uncompensated theft and proposes as a champion an equally souless monster that turns a blind eye to suffering, pain and humanity; that treats thieves as murderers and seeks to enthrone some sort of anarchic oligarchy as a god to be worshipped by the cringing masses.

Her writing, I suppose, has been defended as a towering classic of modern literature. “Towering” is an easy one to see. But this is a manifesto, plain and simple. One might as well describe Mein Kampf as a collection of iambic verses as pin the label “literature” onto this lumbering behemoth. Quite beside its decidedly unpalatable philosophy (it is tempting to refer to it as a theology), this book is unreadable largely because of Ayn Rand’s refusal to admit that people are complex. Her heroes are flawless symbols of her better age; her villains make Captain Hook seem intricately motivated and multifaceted. When not engaged in political speeches (which may or may not last in one case for some 30,000 words) her heroes regress to thinking about sex in clean, clinical and machinelike terms. Can anyone say, “metaphor”? The shameless transparency of Rand’s writing might be intended to demonstrate how black and white the issue is, and how never the twain shall meet, but it sometimes seems as crude and risible as a childish scrawl.

So much for that, then. But besides the crass and artless message portrayed in the book – and the brutal way in which it is crammed down the reader’s throat – is there anything to redeem it? Well…no. Really, the book reeks of a tantrum of global proportions, and if you ever manage to claw yourself to the end of this 1000 page sleeping pill, it will be to the reverberating echo of Rand’s sad ghost screeching, “Me! Me! Mine! Give!”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: